Reference Filed to disqualify Imran khan over Ayesha Gulalai Allegations

Legal counselor Raja Basharat has documented an appeal to in the Election Commission of Pakistan, looking for Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) administrator’s preclusion on the premise of “dishonorable” charges of provocation leveled against him by previous PTI official Ayesha Gulalai.

PML-N’s Hina Pervaiz Butt, additionally on Wednesday, presented a determination in the Punjab Assembly for Imran Khan’s preclusion on the premise of Article 62 and 63 in light of Gulalai’s charges. A day prior, as she declared to go separate ways with the PTI, Gulalai denounced Khan and his “gang” of having an “indecent character”.

She had affirmed that Khan “would forward improper and unequivocal instant messages to party women”, asserting that she got the principal such message in 2013.

Tending to the media outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday, PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi said that Imran Khan must react to the charges leveled against him. Abbasi welcomed Imran Khan to hold a public interview at night to apologize to the country and present himself for responsibility.

“At whatever point a claim has been made against me, I held a question and answer session inside five minutes to uncover the truth,” Abbasi said.

Abbasi said that in 2013, he had requested that the nation not let their “moms, girls and sisters” go to the revitalizes of the PTI to “shield them from this individual.”

He said Khan ought to be embarrassed for requesting that Gulalai demonstrate the messages as verification and for revealing to her that she is not a Pakhtun. “The little girls of the nation are requesting that you look for forgiveness,” he kept up.

Restriction pioneer Khursheed Shah likewise upheld PML-N’s interest for an examination, saying, “The issue concerning Gulalai is lamentable. Ladies never make charges including themselves. It ought to be examined.”

The PTI chairman additionally faces another exclusion reference blaming him for getting reserves for his gathering from precluded sources and giving a false affirmation that his gathering never got stores from any unlawful source.